Insured succeeded on summary judgment application as the insured had not voluntarily surrendered defibrillator units as a result of the purchaser’s fraudulent intent. The claim was not excluded as a conditional sale because there was no sale and no evidence of any agreement or intent to withhold title.

13. August 2019 0
Insurance law – Commercial general liability insurance – All-risk – Fraud – Exclusion – Practice – Summary judgment Heart Zap Services Inc. v. Lloyd’s Underwriters, [2019] O.J. No. 3441, 2019 ONSC 3667, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, June 28, 2019, J.D. O’Flynn J. The insured is in the business of selling defibrillator units. The insured received an ...

Insurer liable for damage to roof of insured’s trailer, as well as water damage to trailer that followed despite the water damage not arising immediately

Insurance law – Automobile insurance – Trailer – Collision – Exclusions – Interpretation of policy – Damages Targett v. Royal and Sun Alliance Co., [2019] N.J. No. 91, 2019 NLPC 1318C00191, Newfoundland and Labrador Provincial Court, March 22, 2019, W. Gorman Prov. Ct. J. The insured owned a travel trailer that was damaged when the roof ...

Insurer’s application to summarily dismiss an injured pedestrian’s claim against her father’s automobile insurer where the plaintiff was hit by eggs thrown out of a moving vehicle was dismissed as there was a genuine issue for trial

Insurance law – Automobile insurance – Exclusions – Unidentified motorist – Uninsured motorist – Chain of causation – Ownership – use or operation of motor vehicle – Statutory provisions – Practice – Summary judgments Gilbraith v. Intact Insurance Co., [2019] O.J. No. 1523, 2019 ONSC 1875, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 22, 2019, A. Sosna ...